• WisBusiness

Friday, February 21, 2014

Tom Still: In small, unseen ways, Wisconsin still makes it hard on emerging companies


By Tom Still
A drug development company in the Madison area that raised $8 million in financing from angel and venture investors, some of it from outside Wisconsin, received an unhappy surprise from state government when it learned it would be taxed on the capital raised.

That's not a tax on earned revenue from sales of products – the young company is still pursuing federal regulatory approval for its drugs, which have yet to hit the market – but a tax on the capital raised from investors itself.

"The company is on a very tight budget," said John Neis, managing director of Venture Investors LLC, a lead Wisconsin investor. "They were shocked to learn they were starting out $24,000 behind budget as soon as they closed on the financing."

Wisconsin is perhaps the only state that taxes private investments in so-called "foreign corporations," which are C Corporations most often registered in the state of Delaware. Many U.S. companies incorporate in The First State: Nearly two-thirds of all Fortune 500 companies are incorporated in Delaware and three-quarters of all initial public offerings in the United States involve Delaware companies.

Companies don't do so to dodge taxes at home, as state tax laws in Wisconsin and elsewhere largely boil down to a test of where the company physically does business, hires workers and makes sales.

Rather, they do so because Delaware's incorporation process is modern and efficient. Politicians of both parties in Delaware understand the importance of keeping the state's corporate law up to date, and Delaware courts are renowned for their expertise and expedited dockets.

As a result, many startup companies in Wisconsin are – or, should be if they expect to get professional financing – C Corporations. Like similar companies in other states, many of Wisconsin's homegrown "C Corps" are incorporated in Delaware.

With angel and venture capital investment dollars scarce for many young companies, the question arises: Why is Wisconsin virtually alone in taxing capital raised by those companies?

"I know of no other state that taxes the capital raised at the time of investment like this," said Neis, an early stage investor for nearly 30 years. "It is always a shock to investors from outside the state that are investing in the state for the first time."

That's why some members of the Legislature want to repeal Wisconsin's investment tax on companies that are registered out of state, even though their roots, offices and workers are here.

"C-Corps have no issue with paying taxes on earned income, but capital from investors is difficult to come by for Wisconsin startup companies," said Rep. Mike Kuglitsch, R-New Berlin. "Our position is that these companies are doing business in Wisconsin; their staff is in Wisconsin and the vast majority of – if not all – of their dollars raised from investors are spent in Wisconsin."

If enacted, this idea would help Wisconsin's early stage economy produce more companies and jobs. Here are other examples of Wisconsin policy initiatives that have received national attention:

* In its annual report on trends in tech-based development, the State Science and Technology Institute cited Wisconsin and New York as two recent examples of creative approaches to capital development. This was due to the Legislature's overwhelmingly support for a "fund-of-funds" that will begin with a $25 million state investment and attract matching private dollars.

* That same report by SSTI cited Wisconsin's decision to amend state securities laws to permit equity crowdfunding. In other states where similar laws are already in effect, there are signs of increased economic activity.

* It also highlighted the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp.'s $300,000 investment in the BrightStar Wisconsin Foundation, which is beginning to invest in Wisconsin companies. In mid-February, WEDC and the UW System announced creation of a $2 million fund to help transfer technology from other system campuses.

* The latest Halo Report by the Angel Capital Association cited a Madison angel network, Wisconsin Investment Partners, as one of the nation's most active in the third quarter of 2013. Milwaukee's Golden Angels Network was called out in another Halo report as one of the top groups in the nation for dollars invested per deal.

* In a recent report on Colorado's efforts to create a statewide angel network, Xconomy cited the experience of the Wisconsin Angel Network and the overall success of Wisconsin's investor tax credits program.

If Wisconsin wants to build a truly competitive capital market, eliminating archaic barriers to investment would help. Ending Wisconsin's tax on investments in so-called "foreign corporations" would signal to investors everywhere that Wisconsin understands what it takes to build young companies.

-- Still is president of the Wisconsin Technology Council. He is the former associate editor of the Wisconsin State Journal in Madison.

Labels:


Comments: 0

Post a Comment

Back to BizOpinion main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

BizOpinion site feed
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

wisbusiness.com Social News

Follow Us

Site Sponsors

ARCHIVE

· January 2009
· February 2009
· March 2009
· April 2009
· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· October 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2013 WisBusiness.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisPolitics.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications