• WisBusiness

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Kara Slaughter: Sometimes we don't know a good thing until it's gone


By Kara Slaughter
Despite a slick ad campaign to the contrary, most of us in Wisconsin are pretty sure that our dairy cows are happier than their California cousins. Based on recent figures, it seems that the same is likely true for the dairy farm owners. California lost 105 dairy farms in 2012. That's a lot of farms any way you slice it, but in a state like California with less than 1,600 dairy herds (compared to around 12,000 in Wisconsin) losing over 100 herds in a year is a painful blow.

Why were California dairies hit so hard in 2012? In short, the risks inherent in the California model of dairying came home to roost. In contrast to Wisconsin dairy farms, which own land as well as cows and produce a high percentage of their own feed, California dairies rely on purchasing grain and forages from out of state. With corn prices at record highs and alfalfa stores at record lows due to the drought, California dairies felt the pinch when it came to feeding its cows last year.

According to the 2007 USDA Census of Agriculture, 30 percent of farmland in Wisconsin is rented. In California, by contrast, the percentage of rented acres is closer to 50 percent. It is important to note that this figure represents all types of crops and operations, not just dairy farms. But to the extent that the figures are emblematic of the differences between the Wisconsin and California models of agriculture, these numbers suggest that land ownership is a risk mitigation strategy that has served Wisconsin farmers well in an era of great economic volatility.

Sometimes we don't know a good thing until it's gone. We've got a good thing going here in Wisconsin – animal agriculture is still largely tied to the land base that supports it. The received wisdom is that the hottest trends in finance and fashion start on the coasts and work their way inward. Our coastal compatriots may chide us for being behind the times, but we also have the chance to see which ideas work and which don't. The current state of affairs in California suggests strongly that the concept of separating the acres from the cows is a bandwagon we do not want to hop on.

Why should we be contemplating these questions right now in Wisconsin? For one, the trend of renting rather than owning acres is growing: the percent of rented acres was 26 percent in 1987 and 27 percent in 1997. If one of our methods for supporting the dairy industry is minimizing risk, that is not a positive trend. Taking some of the steam out of the current run- up in land values would go a long way toward making land ownership viable for all farms in Wisconsin, and particularly beginning farms.

In this context, we should question the current proposal by the governor to make it easier for foreign corporations and individuals to buy large tracts of land in Wisconsin. Such a change would likely have an inflationary effect on land values, driving land ownership even further out of reach. The strength of Wisconsin's dairy farms lies in their diversification and resilience – a brilliant system where manure feeds the plants, the plants feed the cows, and the cows feed the farmer. All of this works best when the cows and the land are part of the same farm. A farm that is producing both grain and milk is in a much better position to weather price and weather shocks than one that is not.

Our friend Nick Levendofsky from Kansas Farmers Union recently shared a photo of a circa-1970 Moor Man's feed decorative plate. It features a picture of a barn and silo surrounded by rolling fields of grain and pasture, and flanked on three sides by beef and dairy cows, pigs, chickens, and sheep. The inscription at the top reads: "Buy only what you cannot raise or process on your farm or ranch." The cows on that plate, feeding on the bounty from the surrounding hillsides, look pretty happy to me.

-- Slaughter is government relations director for the Wisconsin Farmers Union.

Labels:


Comments: 0

Post a Comment

Back to BizOpinion main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

BizOpinion site feed
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

wisbusiness.com Social News

Follow Us

Site Sponsors

ARCHIVE

· January 2009
· February 2009
· March 2009
· April 2009
· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· October 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2013 WisBusiness.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisPolitics.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications