• WisBusiness

Monday, March 4, 2013

Tom Still: Beginning of ‘sequester’ budget cuts drive home debate over federal R&D role

By Tom Still
Embedded in the national debate over automatic cuts in the federal budget – the so-called "sequester" – is a question that could hit Wisconsin harder than many states: What is Washington's role in fostering innovation?

The answer is vital to the state's academic research institutions, many of its entrepreneurs and the larger goal of making Wisconsin more competitive in the global economy.

Major research universities such as the UW-Madison and the Medical College of Wisconsin, academic health centers, small businesses driven by R&D and others are bracing for the effects of "sequestration," or automatic spending cuts, to programs that have historically attracted federal dollars.

These programs finance basic research as well as applied research that spurs American innovation while creating new companies and jobs, which are the life's blood of the U.S. economy.

Unless Congress and the Obama administration pull off the "Jedi mind meld" the president envisioned Friday, rolling cuts will take place in the National Institutes of Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Science Foundation. Estimates vary, but some experts fear two-thirds of all new research grants would be eliminated.

In a Feb. 27 letter to Wisconsin's two U.S. senators, UW System President Kevin Reilly predicted the UW-Madison alone could lose about $35 million in research funding over the coming year. That's off a base of roughly $1 billion per year.

"The figure would be compounded by losses at all the institutions because every institution of the UW System receives NSF funding, which is scheduled for deep cuts," Reilly said. "Of equal concern is the fear that research agencies will slow down renewals and reduce the aggregate number of new awards that are approved. This will result in fewer grants approved, less research undertaken, and a reduced capacity to grow the economy or advance medical care."

The issue is more important to Wisconsin than most states because academic R&D is one of relatively few areas in the federal budget where the state performs well. Wisconsin boast a little more than 1.8 percent of the nation's population but it attracts nearly 2.2 percent of the nation's academic R&D spending. The state also fares well in attracting its share of Small Business Innovation Research grants, which are awarded by 11 different federal agencies to companies and researchers with the most promising commercial technologies.

Will all the gloom-and-doom take place overnight now that the March 1 deadline has passed? Not really. It will take some time for federal agencies to figure out where cuts will take place, and how soon, and Congress and Obama still face a March 27 deadline for passing a "continuing resolution" for the current fiscal year.

Just as the "fiscal cliff" debate before Jan. 1 resulted in some giant cans being kicked down the road, so might the latest sequester crisis. However, the debate is so far missing a sense of bipartisan consensus that was evident even during last fall's presidential election. Republican Mitt Romney said one of the government's useful roles is fostering innovation while investing in technologies – power generation, fuel cells, nanotechnology and materials science – that spur economic growth. For his part, Obama has stressed the importance of alternative energy and related technologies and using two-year colleges to train workers in tech and health fields.

One of America's enduring advantages in a competitive world is its ability to invent and innovate. The marketplace can't pull out new ideas if they aren't there. Federal investment in R&D since World War II has been the seed corn for countless ideas, thousands of companies and millions of private-sector jobs that might not exist today if not for a commitment to basic research.

Wisconsin doesn't haul in a wealth of defense or Medicare dollars, at least compared to other states, but its R&D centers and entrepreneurs compete admirably for merit-based grants. That's an edge that could be lost if cuts over time fall disproportionately on research and development.

-- Still is president of the Wisconsin Technology Council. He is the former associate editor of the Wisconsin State Journal in Madison.


Comments: 0

Post a Comment

Back to BizOpinion main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

BizOpinion site feed

wisbusiness.com Social News

Follow Us

Site Sponsors


· January 2009
· February 2009
· March 2009
· April 2009
· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
Copyright ©2013 WisBusiness.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisPolitics.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications