• WisBusiness

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

With less federal funding likely, can Wisconsin attract more industry research?

By Tom Still
Even after the federal debt ceiling is raised, one thing is certain about federal spending over the next decade: There will be less of it than expected. To be precise, federal spending will drop by about $2.4 trillion from current estimates. That means a full range of programs, from social services to defense to academic research, are likely to feel the pinch.

For major research universities such as the UW-Madison, that could present a troubling scenario.

Year after year, the UW-Madison is among the nation's leaders in attracting "sponsored" research, meaning research sponsored by federal agencies, private foundations, industry and, in small amounts, state government. In fact, the UW-Madison has ranked among the nation's top five academic R&D powerhouses for more than 20 years running – with more than $1 billion in sponsored research from all sources in fiscal 2009, according to the National Science Foundation.

Because the UW-Madison has excelled over time at attracting merit-based grants from federal agencies such as the National Institutes of Health, it may become more vulnerable if federal research funding takes a hit. Perhaps the best research institutions will always do well under any circumstances, but it may also be a good time to start hedging some bets.

A recent report by the State Science and Technology Institute demonstrates why Wisconsin's major research institutions – which also include the Medical College of Wisconsin and the UW-Milwaukee – should encourage more industry sponsored research.

According to SSTI, Wisconsin is below-average in attracting industry R&D dollars to its major research institutions. The state's academic research institutions reported about $24.4 million in industry-sponsored R&D in fiscal 2009, which represented just 2 percent of total academic R&D spending in Wisconsin. There was about $1.23 billion in total academic R&D spending in Wisconsin in fiscal 2009, counting science, engineering and the humanities.

Wisconsin ranked 48th among the 50 states in its "share" of industry research spending as a percentage of the state's total academic R&D. It ranked 28th in actual dollars spent. In both categories, Wisconsin fell behind neighbors such as Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota and even Iowa.

What do those states have in their academic institutions that Wisconsin lacks? Nothing, when it comes to sheer expertise and range of scientific disciplines. However, Wisconsin may lack a great deal when it comes to making a persuasive case to industry.

Commission after commission at the UW-Madison has urged that industry research should be handled differently than federal R&D contracts, at least in terms of barriers to entry and overall paperwork. But a one-size-fits-all approach has persisted, discouraging businesses that believe they need to make too many stops to get their work done.

"Business goes to where doing business is easily facilitated," said Carl Gulbrandsen, managing director of the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, which is the intellectual property arm for the UW-Madison. "We haven't always done a good job of that at Wisconsin."

Other universities are figuring out better ways to enhance industry research, which only makes sense in an era when more companies are willing to contract for such services than keep them in-house.

The Ohio State University recently recruited a technology transfer director from the University of Utah to serve as vice president for commercialization. The University of Washington just recruited the University of Utah president as its new president – primarily because of his success at making connections with industry. At the University of Michigan, a decade-long push to improve industry R&D was featured in the Chronicle of Higher Education under the headline, "With federal support uncertain, university researchers look to industry."

There are signs of change at the UW-Madison, where Chancellor Biddy Martin recently resigned and Interim Chancellor David Ward is filling that role until a national search for her replacement can begin. The No. 2 leader at UW-Madison, Provost Paul DeLuca, recently stressed the need for the campus to better capitalize on the potential for increasing its industry research contracts. In fact, DeLuca has asked that an Office of Industrial Contracting be established by the UW-Madison.

Also on line through the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery is the private Morgridge Institute for Research, which opened early this year. It offers industry options to conduct research near the campus, but in a private setting.

Wisconsin's major research institutions already conduct top-flight research, especially for federal agencies and private foundation that know and trust their work. It's now time to persuade private industry to do its R&D shopping here, too.

-- Still is president of the Wisconsin Technology Council. He is the former associate editor of the Wisconsin State Journal in Madison.


Comments: 1

At March 9, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Blogger NagaRaj Raj said...

Madison has exceeded expectations after some time at pulling in legitimacy based awards from government offices, for example, the National Institutes of Health, it might turn out to be more defenseless if elected examination financing takes a hit. My name is nagaraj I'm working in this cab services in kochi I thinkMaybe the best research organizations will dependably do well under any circumstances, yet it might likewise be a decent time to begin supporting a few wagers. Science and Technology Institute exhibits why Wisconsin's real research foundations which additionally incorporate the Medical College of Wisconsin and the UW-Milwaukee ought to support more industry supported exploration.


Post a Comment

Back to BizOpinion main page

: See newer blog items : : See older blog items :

BizOpinion site feed

wisbusiness.com Social News

Follow Us

Site Sponsors


· January 2009
· February 2009
· March 2009
· April 2009
· May 2009
· June 2009
· July 2009
· August 2009
· September 2009
· October 2009
· November 2009
· December 2009
· January 2010
· February 2010
· March 2010
· April 2010
· May 2010
· June 2010
· July 2010
· August 2010
· September 2010
· October 2010
· November 2010
· December 2010
· January 2011
· February 2011
· March 2011
· April 2011
· May 2011
· June 2011
· July 2011
· August 2011
· September 2011
· October 2011
· November 2011
· December 2011
· January 2012
· February 2012
· March 2012
· April 2012
· May 2012
· June 2012
· July 2012
· August 2012
· September 2012
· October 2012
· November 2012
· December 2012
· January 2013
· February 2013
· March 2013
· April 2013
· May 2013
· June 2013
· July 2013
· August 2013
· September 2013
· October 2013
· November 2013
· December 2013
· January 2014
· February 2014
· March 2014
· April 2014
· May 2014
· June 2014
· July 2014
· August 2014
· September 2014
· October 2014
· November 2014
· December 2014
· January 2015
· February 2015
· March 2015
· April 2015
· May 2015
· June 2015
· July 2015
· August 2015
· September 2015
· October 2015
· November 2015
· December 2015
· January 2016
· February 2016
· March 2016
· April 2016
· May 2016
· July 2016
· August 2016
· October 2016
· December 2016
Copyright ©2013 WisBusiness.com All rights reserved. | WisOpinion.com | WisPolitics.com  |  Website development by wisnet.com LLC  | Website design by Makin’ Hey Communications